🔗 Share this article

A digital rights group has stated to have scraped a vast number of tracks from the popular streaming service and is preparing to publish them publicly.

Potential Impetus for AI Development

Industry experts said the apparent leak could aid artificial intelligence firms searching for data to train their models.

An entity called Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million entries of metadata such as performer and record names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million songs, stated that the breach did not represent its entire inventory.

“We have located and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,” stated a company spokesperson.

The Swedish service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorized access identified a third party scraped public metadata and employed questionable methods to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Declared Goal and Concerns

Spotify does not believe the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group asserted the music files represented 99.6% of all music listened to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of exchanging large data files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great start,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “preserving humanity’s information and culture”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Battleground

A composer and campaigner for defending artists’ copyright, said the leaked music would probably be utilized for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on pirated data is unfortunately common in the tech sector, so this accessed music is highly likely to be used instructing AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site makes references to a large online archive, a vast online archive of copyrighted books that has reportedly been used by Meta to develop its systems.

A founder of an AI startup posted on LinkedIn that members of the public could in theory “build their own personal free equivalent of the service”. The executive added it could also enable tech companies to “train on contemporary music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a key issue between artists, writers and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Considerations and Reactions

In the UK, artists and writers have protested against a government suggestion to let AI companies utilize protected work without permission unless the rights holder signals. Virtually every participant to a government call for evidence on the proposal has supported artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for technology, innovation and development informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The government has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.